Home Up Loka Projects Search Site Updates Contents

Loka Alert 8:4 (July 11, 2001)

PLEASE FORWARD WIDELY WHERE APPROPRIATE

GOD SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BETTER
By Larry Wilson

Dear Friends and Colleagues,

This is one in an occasional series on the democratic politics of research, science, and technology issued free of charge by the nonprofit Loka Institute. TO BE ADDED TO THE LOKA ALERT E-MAIL LIST, or to reply to this post, please send a message to Loka@Loka.org . TO BE REMOVED from the Loka Alert E-mail list, send an E-mail with no subject or message text to loka-alert-unsubscribe@egroups.com . (If that fails, just notify us at <Loka@Loka.org>). IF YOU ENJOY LOKA ALERTS, PLEASE INVITED INTERESTED FRIENDS & COLLEAGUES TO SUBSCRIBE. Thanks!

On October 11, 2000 one of, if not the largest, environmental disaster in the history of North America occurred deep within the Appalachian Mountains of Eastern Kentucky (USA). This happened when a coal waste impoundment, owned and operated by Martin County Coal Co. broke into abandoned underground mines and spilled in excess of 750 million gallons of coal slurry into nearby streams and rivers. Even though it was many times greater that the infamous Exxon Valdez disaster, and directly affected many towns and villages, the mainstream media, national environmental organizations, and political entities paid little or no attention. The following Loka Alert by Larry Wilson (Loka Board member and Founder of Appalachian Focus) provides readers with a concrete example of how our nation's reliance on resource-intensive energy affects the people of Appalachia. For more information on coal issues in Central Appalachia (and for pictures of the spill), check out Appalachian Focus's web site, www.appalachianfocus.org, or email Larry Wilson at larry@appalachianfocus.org.

Cheers to all,

Jill Chopyak
Executive Director


The Loka Institute
P.O. Box 355, Amherst, MA 01004, USA
E-mail <Loka@Loka.org> Web <http://www.Loka.org>
Tel. 413-559-5860; Fax 413-559-5811


CONTENTS

(I) GOD SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BETTER by Larry Wilson............(7 pages) 

(II) LOKA INSTITUTE UPDATES.................................(3/4 page)

(III) INTERNSHIPS AT THE LOKA INSTITUTE.....................(1/3 page)

(IV) ABOUT THE LOKA INSTITUTE..............................(1/3 page)


July 11, 2001
Loka Alert 8:4

GOD SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BETTER
By Larry Wilson, Appalachian Focus

On October 11, 2000 one of, if not the largest, environmental disaster in the history of North America occurred deep within the Appalachian Mountains of Eastern Kentucky (USA). This happened when a coal waste impoundment, owned and operated by Martin County Coal Co. (owned by A.T. Massey Coal Co. which is owned in turn by the Flour Corporation) broke into abandoned underground mines and spilled in excess of 750 million gallons of coal slurry into nearby streams and rivers. Even though it was many times greater that the infamous Exxon Valdez disaster, and directly affected many towns and villages, the mainstream media, national environmental organizations, and political entities paid little or no attention. Why?

THE CENTRAL APPALACHIAN COALFIELDS

The Coalfields of the Central Appalachian Mountains include portions of the U.S. states of Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia and the entirety of West Virginia. Within this region is concentrated some of the world's richest natural resources. Coal, oil, gas, water and timber are abundant. Also within this region resides some of the nation's poorest people. 

This region came to national attention in the 1960's because of the degree and extent of poverty there. Little relief has come to the people of the region since the infamous "War on Poverty." At that time one in three persons in the Appalachian coalfields lived in poverty 50% higher than the national average. Currently the poverty rate is 49% higher than the national average. Presently, the 
high school completion rate is only 51%. Other statistics are similar.

There are several reasons for this disparity. First, the region has been artificially divided in ways that divide and separate the residents of the area from one another. These barriers have been very effective in prohibiting collective organizing and action. Perhaps the most effective barriers are simply state lines. This relatively small area is in portions of six states, resulting in different agency structure, laws, contact points, etc. Central Appalachia falls within three separate regions of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA), which complicates environmental permitting and enforcement. All of this is in spite of the fact that the residents of the Central Appalachians share a rich and unique culture, a common single industry dominance (coal) that shapes the economic and political scene, a more or less common ancestry, and a common history of independence and strong family values.

A second reason for the socioeconomic woes is the stereotyping which has been internalized by some of the residents to the point that many believe that the only way to escape their plight is to leave the region and/or deny and erase their culture and heritage. Gallons of ink and reams of paper have been consumed writing about the "quaint" people of the Central Appalachians. Within mainstream American society, ethnic and racial jokes and stereotypes are no longer permissible with one exception. Television series such as _The Dukes of Hazzard_, _Beverly Hillbillies_, and _Green Acres_, cartoons like _Snuffy Smith_, and the movie _Deliverance_ still thrive. In order to expedite the extraction of resources, the people too must be exploited. In order to make this acceptable, they are dehumanized and made to appear "different" from the rest of the nation in a way that validates their exploitation.

DISASTER STRIKES

The October 11th spill began when an underground coal mine collapsed and the contents of a 72-acre "pond" containing coal slurry approximately the thickness of wet cement poured from the "pond" into the mines and gushed out two openings into nearby Coldwater Fork and Wolf Creeks. The slurry then made its way into the Tug Fork river and on to the Big Sandy River. It eventually emptied into the Ohio River near Ashland, Kentucky.

The spill was so devastating that Kentucky Governor Paul Patton was forced to declare a state of emergency for ten counties. The spill forced the cities of Inez, Kentucky; Louisa, Kentucky and Kermit, West Virginia to close water intakes and rely on supplies provided by trucks and temporary pipelines operated by the national guard and citizen volunteers. 

Martin County schools were canceled for one month. Restaurants, stores, and businesses were forced to close their doors. Many residents were forced to evacuate their homes and seek temporary shelter wherever it could be found.

This is an area that relies heavily on underground aquifers as a source for potable water. These private wells and springs are no longer usable by residents.

Now, several months after the original incident, the adverse effects are very prominent among the residents of the region. 

- Many residents have red blotches, called "sludge bumps" by neighborhood children, spread across their bodies.

- Those who have dared to blame the coal company or file suits for property and health damages are subjected to harassing phone calls.

- There are telltale black rings on trees where the sludge reached its peak and the spill has left similar scars on the people whose lives were disrupted.

- Roads and bridges were rendered impassable and remain insufficient.

- One can throw rocks in the creek and watch as a plume of black follows the impact. 

- One resident's backyard still looks like a reclaimed strip mine site, very poor quality rocky soil and a thin cover of grass growing in little bits and pieces. There were still some bald spots in the yard. The yard is still rippled with the treads of bulldozers and heavy equipment. 

- According to the U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) analysis, "in some samples of the source coal slurry material, copper, vanadium, manganese, barium, arsenic, and cobalt were above levels of health concern". The report also indicated a slightly elevated level of copper in the raw (untreated) water at the Martin County Water Plant in Inez. The report also states "in some forms, barium, arsenic, and vanadium can produce health effects by skin contact. In most cases, these effects can occur after prolonged exposure lasting a year or more. Like most heavy metals, all of these compounds effect the digestive system, the kidneys (except manganese), and the liver (except vanadium). Many of these compounds produce effects on the central nervous system and some of them produce effects on the cardiovascular system". Arsenic, cobalt and barium can also produce swelling of the eyes. The concentration of arsenic found in the slurry can also cause skin irritation. Exposure to high levels of cobalt can also lead to skin rash. 

- There is still a considerable amount of sludge left in the "reclaimed" backyards and the creeks.

- At Wolf Creek, the creek that got mostly watery slurry, it appears that the cleanup operation there is finally over. The hydromulch and the heavy equipment are mostly gone, and all along the denuded creek banks there is a swath of bright new green grass and a few weeds, but little other plant life in many stretches. There are thousands of new stumps along the creek where the riparian vegetation has been removed for the cleanup operation, and the creek bed is full of silt. Basically Wolf Creek will just be a muddy trench baking in the sun for the next ten or fifteen years until the trees can grow back. 

- Although the large blobs of sludge are gone, there is still a lot of black silt in the creek bed and along the banks. Martin County Coal has installed black plastic fences about 18 inches high along 
both sides of Wolf and Coldwater Creeks to reduce the amount of soil erosion, but this seems kind of absurd and ironic in light of the amount of silt already in the creek, and the level of damage that has already been done to the creek by the spill and the cleanup operation. 

RESPONSES

Martin County Coal initially refused to respond to questions about the spill. They simply provide a news release that blamed the spill on a "sudden and unexpected" collapse of the underground mine roof. They place company guards on the state highway leading to the site of the disaster and refused entry to any one, with the exception of regulators and one company led group of news reporters. Regulatory agencies would simply state that the cause of the disaster was "being investigated". Industry officials were silent.

However, as the magnitude and effects of the disaster became publicly known, silence and simplistic statements were no longer acceptable. The public demanded actions.

Kentucky Department for Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement issued four notices of noncompliance to Martin County Coal for violations. They accused the company of "engaging in an unsafe practice by allowing substandard water and slurry" to flow from the impoundment into the underground and creating an "imminent environmental damage." 

Martin County Coal was ordered to "immediately cease all substandard discharges" and "...re-establish access to all driveways and any county and state roads blocked by slurry." They were also ordered to replace all fish and other aquatic life killed and to rebuild roads and bridges damaged by the spill.

Governor Paul Patton of Kentucky declared a state of emergency for 10 Kentucky counties stating the spill was, "endangering the public health and safety, and could result in potential environmental 
damages."

Martin County Coal began dredging the slurry from streams and placing it in newly constructed temporary "ponds" on top of a nearby mountain. The company also sent two tractor-trailers filled with gallon jugs of water to the town of Louisa, Kentucky. They also obeyed an order from the state and removed their armed guards from the state highway allowing public access leading to the site of the spill.

The Unified Command (State Federal Agencies dealing with the disaster) admitted that the Martin County Coal Company's president edited news releases issued by them. They agreed to cease that practice.

Martin County Coal's president Dennis Hatfield met at least four times with members of the effected communities and promised that the company would "...get it back to normal." He publicly apologized for the incident saying, "We very much regret that this has happened. It is a mess. It's a disaster. And we're just trying our best to get things back to normal. We've made mistakes," Hatfield said, "I'd be the first to admit that. We've messed up a bunch of times."

However, two months later, in response to five civil lawsuits for damages against Martin County Coal, the company made two defenses claiming:

- That the slurry spill "was the direct, sole and proximate result of an act of God, the occurrence of which was not within the control of Martin County Coal", and;

- That any alleged negligence by the company occurred more than five years before the October 24, 2000 filing date of the suits and therefore is barred by statutes of limitation.

The U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (the same Agency that would later acknowledge hazardous levels of chemicals in the slurry) met with residents and assured that there was no health hazards. One resident was quick to point out that each member of the state and federal experts assembled to make the statement, had bottled water in front of them.

COAL SLURRY "PONDS" 

Coal slurry is a thick mix of water, coal waste, rock and chemical used to "clean" the coal. It contains many heavy metals such as arsenic, mercury and lead, but is not classified by the state and federal governments as hazardous since it is supposedly not buried in landfills nor discharged into public waters. Extremely large amounts of slurry are produced in the processing of coal prior to shipping. Coal companies dispose of the slurry by pouring it into huge impoundments built behind dams made of bigger chunks of preparation plant waste or by injecting it into old, abandoned underground mines. Over time, solids in the slurry settle to the bottom and the liquid remaining on top is discharged into the nearest stream.

Today there is an estimated 1,000 such slurry ponds scattered throughout the coalfields. The largest concentration of these is in the Appalachian Mountains of West Virginia and Eastern Kentucky.

HISTORY 

The history of coal waste impoundments is not a good one. In 1972, a slurry dam operated by Pittston Coal on Buffalo Creek in Logan County, West Virginia collapsed. Flooding killed 125 people and destroyed 500 homes.

In 1981, a similar dam in Harlan County, Kentucky broke killing one person and destroying much of the community of Ages.

In 1996, a CONSOL Energy coal waste dam at the company's Buchanan No. 1 Mine near Oakwood, Virginia leaked into old underground mine workings and blew out the other side of the mountain. Coal slurry gushed into a tributary of the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River at a rate of up to 1,000 gallons per minute. The 25-mile spill blackened creeks and killed fish.

Also in 1996, an Arch Mineral Corp. impoundment in Lee County, Virginia broke with similar results.

A.T. Massey Coal's track record is less than spectacular. In 1994, Martin County Coal was fined for a similar collapse that spilled blackwater "in amounts too great to be measured" - into area streams. Since 1986, the company has been fined for nine separate spills from sediment ponds and waste impoundments. In West Virginia, Massey subsidiaries have been repeatedly cited by state and federal regulators for spills from their mining operations along the Coal River in Boone and Raleigh counties. USEPA recently settled spill cases against Massey subsidiaries Elk Run Coal Company and Goals Coal Company. 

It should not have come as a surprise that this particular structure failed. Three years ago, U.S. federal Mine Safety and Health Administration investigators inspected the Martin County Coal Corporation dam. They found that a manmade barrier between the impoundment and underground mine works may not have been designed to withstand water pressure from the slurry. They concluded that a breakthrough at the impoundment could endanger miners and public safety.

In 1994 a federal engineer investigating yet another coal slurry spill from a Martin County Coal impoundment warned that seals separating the impoundment's floor from an underground mine were inadequate. In that same year, another engineer with the Mine Safety and Health Administration warned that area mine maps, used to gain approval of the structure "appear to be inaccurate. Therefore, a very conservative design is warranted. If the water in the impoundment broke through, it is very possible that they would fail and a loss of life could occur. In spite of this, Martin County Coal was permitted to expand the impoundment later in 1994.

A veteran mine-safety expert resigned from the federal team investigating the disaster because of his belief that the group's final report will be a whitewash. A mining engineer with 35 years experience in mine safety said in a letter, "I do not believe the accident investigation report, as it is now being developed, will offer complete and objective analysis of the accident and its causes."

Bill Caylor, president of the Kentucky Coal Association, an industry group of coal-mining companies responded to citizen's allegations of property damage and health effects by stating, "Martin County Coal is a good company with a good reputation. This is a way for residents to get their property bought in an economically depressed market. They are smelling home cooking on a local jury." He responded to a suggestion that such impoundments be banned by saying, "Banning coal impoundments would eliminate mining. If you can't dispose of coal economically, you can't sell your product."

SUMMARY 

To think that there are approximately 1,000 of these impoundments tucked away in the mountains of Central Appalachia is frightening. They have a long history of failing. The agencies whose duty is to regulate these and protect the public and the environment has a long history of protecting the companies instead. The news media whose duty it is to expose these have a long history of ignoring such events in this region (one paper actually reported that it was fortunate that this event occurred in an "uninhabited area"). The people are economically and politically powerless.

These events will continue to occur and worsen until the rest of this nation refuses to accept the exploitation of the people whose only offense is to be born in a region rich in culture and history, but poor in power and money. I don't think that will happen because those who could help us bring about change would rather see us die than to give up their inexpensive energy sources.

And after all, God should know better.


(II) LOKA INSTITUTE UPDATES

* COMMUNITY RESEARCH NETWORK CONFERENCE The Loka Institute sponsored its Fourth Annual Community Research Network Conference July 6-8, 2001 in Austin, TX. Hosted by the Univ. of Texas' Urban Issues Program and the Llano Grande Center for Research and Development, the Conference brought together over 160 participants from all over the world. A full summary of the conference will soon be available on our web site and sent out as a subsequent Loka Alert.

* LOKA ON PUBLIC TELEVISION - The Loka Institute has been selected by public television's Teaching Learning Network to participate in the premiere season of Bridge to One World, a television documentary series from the folks that create the series "Trailside: Make Your Own Adventure." Beginning in October 2001, the series will highlight the places, people and institutions that will affect our lives and society in the 21st century. Loka is proud to be part of this exciting undertaking! For more information, or if you are a company that would like to sponsor the episode featuring the Loka Institute, please contact us!

* LOKA ADVOCACY EFFORTS Loka Institute staff and colleagues from a variety of organizations have been working to include community-based organizations as potential partners and potential applicants in a National Science Foundation program being created by a bill currently before Congress. The bill (H.R. 1858) creates the a Science and Math Education Partnership Program within NSF ($200 million) that promotes science and math education partnerships between universities, science-based associations, local education agencies, and business. For more information about these efforts, please contact us at Loka@Loka.org.

* STRATEGIES FOR COMMUNITIES MOVEMENT Last month, Loka was invited to participate in a workshop hosted by the National Civic League and the Coalition for Healthier Cities & Communities. The workshop aimed to draw upon the experience of national leaders in various community-based fields and to identify strategies that would further a "communities movement" in the U.S. A workshop summary is currently in development. 


(III) LOKA INSTITUTE INTERNSHIPS

The Loka Institute has openings for volunteers, graduate and undergraduate student interns, and work-study students.

Interns' responsibilities include updating our Web page; managing email lists and listservs; conducting background research on issues concerning science, technology, and society; and helping with administrative work. Interns committing to a semester or more will have the opportunity to integrate independent research into their internship experience.

Candidates should be self-motivated and able to work as part of a team as well as independently. A general knowledge and comfort with computers is needed. Experience in Web page maintenance is preferable. Undergraduate students, graduate students, and recent graduates are welcome to apply. Loka is able to provide interns with an expense stipend of $35 per day for volunteering (or $700 per month full-time-equivalent).

If you are interested in working with us to promote a democratic politics of science and technology, please send a resume and a succinct cover letter explaining your interest and dates of 
availability to: The Loka Institute, P.O. Box 355, Amherst, MA 01004, USA. We also are accept applications by e-mail to <Loka@Loka.org> or by fax to 413-559-5811.

*********************************************************

(IV) ABOUT THE LOKA INSTITUTE

The Loka Institute is a nonprofit organization dedicated to making research, science and technology more responsive to democratically-decided social and environmental concerns. In doing so, we focus our efforts on achieving the following areas: 

Critical assessments: evaluation of science and technology policies and decision-making processes; evaluation of citizen participation and the social and environmental impact of science and technology policies at all levels.

Education: build citizen and community capacity to have an effective voice in decision-making processes at the local, regional, national and international levels.

Dissemination and advocacy: create avenues for citizen participation in research, science and technology processes and policies. 

TO FIND OUT MORE ABOUT our current activities and projects, to participate in our on-line discussion groups, to download or order publications, or to help, please visit our Web page: <http://www.Loka.org>. Or contact us via E-mail at <Loka@Loka.org> or by telephone at 413-559-5860. 


Up Loka Alert 10:1 Loka Alert 9:6 Loka Alert 9:5 Loka Alert 9:4 Loka Alert 9:2 CIO-100 AWARD Loka Alert 9:1 Loka Alert 8:6 Loka Alert 8:5 Loka Alert 8:4 Loka Alert 8:3 Loka Alert 8:2 Loka Alert 8.1 Loka Alert 7.5 Loka Alert 7.4 Loka Alert 7.3 Loka Alert 7.2 Loka Alert 7.1 Loka Alert 6.7 Loka Alert 6.6 Loka Alert 6.5 Loka Alert 6.4 Loka Alert 6.3 Loka Alert 6.2 Loka Alert 4.4 Loka Alert 4.3 Life, Liberty and GT

 

Support Loka with an on-line secure-site donation: Donate Now!

The Loka Institute
660 Pennsylvania Avenue, S.E.
Suite 302
Washington, D.C. 20003
Telephone: 301-585-9398
Send mail to Loka@Loka.org with questions or comments about this web site.
All materials are for educational purposes only. All rights revert to author where applicable.
This page last modified: October 14, 2004 The Loka Institute